Uncategorized

Local 79's 2016 City Budget Guide – Gapping

27 January 2016

Gapping is the amount Divisions are expected to save each year because positions are left vacant either intentionally or through unanticipated staff turnover.
The problem is that, although City Council wants to expand services, Councillors haven’t been willing to find ways of paying for those services. This means Divisions have to absorb additional costs while expanding programming. Many rely on vacancies over-and-above their approved gapping levels to meet budget targets.
Since Local 79 and progressive Councillors raised questions about staff vacancies in September, 2013, Management has been reporting on vacancies and promising to reduce vacancy levels.
Unfortunately, only minimal progress has been made on reducing vacancies. In fact, this year’s third-quarter vacancy (2,578) is only 93 positions lower than in it was in 2013!
It’s not surprising that after-gapping vacancies remain high. In 2016, the City expects to save more than $127.3 million through gapping. The after-gapping vacancies we see every year provide savings on top of that amount, but those savings come through reductions in services and increases to your workload.
How much does the City Save through gapping?

Gapping (Rate) Gapping ($ Value)
2014
(approved)
2015
(approved)
2016
(rec/d)
2014 2015 2016
Cluster A Sub-Total 1.6 1.8 1.9 16,357,000 19,452,900 20,882,600
Cluster B Sub-Total 2.8 2.8 3.0 19,922,000 20,461,900 22,052,200
Internal Services Sub-Total 3.7 3.3 3.3 9,127,000 9,883,700 10,099,000
City Manager’s Office Subtotal 4.0 5.0 5.2 2,144,000 2,656,700 2,708,200
Other Programs Subtotal 2.2 2.5 3.2 2,267,000 2,567,200 3,422,400
City Operations Subtotal 2.3 2.4 2.6 49,817,000 55,052,400 59,164,400
Agencies Subtotal 3 2.5 2.4 79,621,000 67,703,500 63,132,500
Tax supported Operations 2.7 2.5 2.5 129,438,000 122,755,900 127,296,900
Rate Supported Operations 2.3 2.3 n/a 6,600,000 6,804,000 n/a
Grand Total 2.7 2.4 n/a 136,038,000 127,467,000 n/a

Which Divisions save the most? Divisions that save over $1 million per year.

Gapping (Rate) Gapping (Value)
2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016
Cluster “B” Fire Services 2 2.0 2.0 7,978,300 8,066,700 8,0836,00
Cluster “A” Parks, Forestry & Recreation 2 2.3 2.2 5,638,000 6,712,800 6,549,00
Cluster “B” Transportation Services 4.9 5 6.3 4,924,000 5,205,000 5,204,700
Internal Services Information and Technology 5.4 3.7 3.8 3,440,000 3,537,000 6,588,300
Cluster “A” TESS 1.6 1.6 1.6 3,162,000 3,109,000 3,109,000
Internal Services Facilities, Real Estate, Environment & Energy 3.4 3.7 3.7 2,628,000 3,223,400 3,244,000
Cluster “B” Engineering & Construction Services 4.2 4.2 4.2 2,519,000 2,556,000 2,220,600
Cluster “A” SSHA 3.2 3.2 3.7 2,193,000 2,214,000 3,601,400
Cluster “A” Toronto Paramedic Services 1.3 1.9 1.9 1,972,000 3,171,700 3,203,100
Cluster “A” Court Services 8.7 12.3 15.6 1,886,000 2,770,700 3,510,700
Internal Services Office of the Treasurer 3 2.8 2.8 1,815,000 1,846,000 1,889,500
Cluster “B” City Planning 3.8 3.8 3.9 1,476,000 1,558,000 1,621,500
Cluster “B” Toronto Building 2.9 2.8 2.9 1,271,000 1,301,700 1,357,700

Some Divisions are even increasing their gapping rates. SSHA, for example, will increase its gapping rate by 0.7% for savings of $0.484 million. Solid Waste Management will save $1.821 million by changing the budgeted gapping from 1.9% to 4.0%. Any increase to gapping rates will put pressure on the services we deliver.
On the other hand, Toronto Public Health is suggesting that it reduce its gapping rate from 5.8 to 4.8. This would enhance TPH’s ability to deliver key services. Unfortunately, Mayor Tory and Budget Committee Chair Gary Crawford have shown that they do not support Toronto Public Health. In fact, they oppose increasing services by reducing gapping.
 
Continue on to our section on Contracting Out –>
<– Return to main page